Influence of different short peripheral cannula materials on the incidence of phlebitis in intensive care units: A post-hoc analysis of the AMOR-VENUS study

Authors

  • Yutaro Shinzato Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan Author
  • Hideto Yasuda Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan , Alliance for Vascular Access Teaching and Research, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia. , Department of Clinical Research Education and Training Unit, Keio University Hospital Clinical and Translational Research Centre (CTR), Tokyo, Japan Author
  • Haruka Taira Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan Author
  • Yuki Kishihara Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan Author
  • Masahiro Kashiura Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan Author
  • Takashi Moriya Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan Author
  • Yuki Kotani Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Japan Author
  • Natsuki Kondo Chiba Emergency and Psychiatric Medical Center, Chiba, Japan Author
  • Kosuke Sekine Division of Clinical Laboratory and Infectious Diseases, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan Author
  • Nobuaki Shime Division of Clinical Laboratory and Infectious Diseases, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan Author
  • Keita Morikane Yamagata University Hospital, Yamagata, Japan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62838/jccm-2026-0012

Keywords:

cannula material stiffness, short peripheral cannula, critically ill, intensive care unit, phlebitis

Abstract

Aim of the study: Short peripheral cannula (SPC)-related phlebitis occurs in 7.5% of critically ill patients, and mechanical irritation from cannula materials is a risk factor. Softer polyurethane cannulas reportedly reduce phlebitis, but the incidence of phlebitis may vary depending on the type of polyurethane. Differences in cannula stiffness may also affect the incidence of phlebitis; however, this relationship is not well understood. This study analyzed intensive care unit (ICU) patient data to compare the incidence of phlebitis across different cannula products, focusing on polyurethane.
Material and Methods: This is a post-hoc analysis of the AMOR-VENUS study that involved 23 ICUs in Japan. We included patients aged ≥ 18 years, who were admitted to the ICU with SPCs. The primary outcome was phlebitis, evaluated using hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Based on the market share and differences in synthesis, polyurethanes were categorized into PEU-Vialon® (BD, USA), SuperCath® (Medikit, Japan), and other polyurethanes; non-polyurethane materials were also analyzed. Multivariable marginal Cox regression analysis was performed using other polyurethanes as a reference.
Results: In total, 1,355 patients and 3,429 SPCs were evaluated. Among polyurethane cannulas, 1,087 (33.5%) were PEU-Vialon®, 702 (21.6%) were SuperCath®, and 276 (8.5%) were other polyurethanes. Among non-polyurethane cannulas, 1,292 (39.8%) were ethylene tetrafluoroethylene (ETFE) cannulas, and 72 (2.2%) used other materials. The highest incidence of phlebitis was observed with SuperCath® (13.1%). Multivariate analysis revealed an HR of 1.45 (95% CI 0.75-2.8, p = 0.21) for PEU-Vialon®, 2.60 (95% CI 1.35-5.00, p < 0.01) for SuperCath®, 2.29 (95% CI 1.19-4.42, p = 0.01) for ETFE, and 2.2 (95% CI 0.46-10.59, p = 0.32) for others.
Conclusions: The incidence of phlebitis varied among polyurethane cannulas. Further research is warranted to determine the causes of these differences.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Downloads

Published

30-04-2026

Issue

Section

Original research article

How to Cite

1.
Shinzato Y, Yasuda H, Taira H, Kishihara Y, Kashiura M, Moriya T, et al. Influence of different short peripheral cannula materials on the incidence of phlebitis in intensive care units: A post-hoc analysis of the AMOR-VENUS study. J Crit Care Med [Internet]. 2026 Apr. 30 [cited 2026 May 1];12(2):252-61. Available from: https://ojs.jccm.ro/index.php/jccm/article/view/94